3rd March 2017: '"The Ignored Pollutant" – Noise, Health and Ecopsychology' » 2017 » Mobbsey's Musings » Paul Mobbs/MEI » FRAW

image

Ramblinactivist 2/17:
"The Ignored Pollutant": Noise, Health and Ecopsychology

Paul Mobbs, Rambinactivist's video blog, 3rd March 2017

Written for The Ecologist, published 9th March 2017


A few days ago I went for a walk, well before the dawn[1], in order to listen to the 'dawn chorus'. It's something I like to do a few times a year, especially in the early Spring when the birdsong is at its loudest.

I've been doing these walks since before my teens. Over that period there's been one inescapable change in the countryside around my home town of Banbury – noise.

In many ways the modern urban-dweller has become immured to noise; we exclude it, and bar it from our thoughts – a process even more challenging since the advent of the personal stereo and the mobile phone. But we never truly escape it.

For those who like to enjoy the natural environment, noise is something to be escaped from within the relative sanctuary of the landscape. These days that's getting harder and harder to accomplish. Not only because of noise from all around, in particular from urban areas, roads and the increasing mechanisation of agriculture; but also due to the increasing level of air traffic overhead.

Walking out before the dawn my objective was to reach Salt Way[2], which fringes the south-western quadrant of Banbury. It's the old Roman salt route from Droitwich to Buckinghamshire, which has existed since long before the town itself, and which links to the more ancient prehistoric Portway and Welsh Road trackways.

Due to its age Salt Way has exceptionally dense, wide and species-rich ancient hedgerows[3] which demarcate it from the surrounding fields.

Perfect for listening to birds.

Except on that morning, even before rush hour, the easterly breeze was wafting the sound of the M40 motorway from over 2½ miles away, on the other side of town.

That got me musing on an interesting paper by Cox et al., Doses of Neighborhood Nature[4], which I'd just read in the journal Bioscience.

In the study the researchers were able to demonstrate a positive correlation between the quality of people's everyday experience of nature, and a lower prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress. These results build upon a wealth of other similar studies which have appeared over the last few years – part of the growing field of ecopsychology[5].

One of the principal metrics the study used to assess the 'quality' of a person's natural experience was the afternoon abundance of birds. While that doesn't strictly correlate to where I am now, stood in the gloom of a pre-dawn byway, I think the comparison was valid – given the louder and intense levels of birdsong I was able experience.

If 'natural' experiences are good for you, does the inverse effect hold true? – that urban noise is bad for you?

The damage of noise to society has been acknowledge in English law since Henry III introduced the concept of 'public nuisance'[6], almost 800 years ago. Urban environments can also create negative health effects[7], especially in terms of stress and mental health.

Generally what many research studies find is that our recovery from the stresses of everyday life tends to be better, and takes place faster, when we are exposed to green landscaped spaces[8] or less noisy natural environments[9].

Difficulty is, that's getting harder to do these days – the result of higher urbanization globally.

Banbury is a growing town. Immediately to the west of the section of Salt Way where I was sat, the construction of a few hundred houses was about to commence. Permission for another thousand was recently granted on the opposite side of the main A361 road – after 150, recently completed homes were won on appeal, which broke the local council's planning policy of setting Salt Way as the natural western boundary to the town. To the north another five hundred are being planned or built, and another 2,500 are being added to the southern edge of the town right now.

That doesn't just mean that the species rich hedgerow along Salt Way will be severed from the countryside by urban development – perhaps reducing its diversity in future.

As each year passes, it takes longer to get to the outside of the town; and progressively harder to escape the 'noise' envelope of the town as its larger size generates higher volumes of traffic, and thus noise.

Road vehicles are not the only significant source of noise. E.g., for those of you who drink instant coffee, the occasional hiss of high pressure steam that radiates out across Banbury is created by your caffeine craving – as the leading brands are made here in Europe's biggest coffee plant.

The common misapprehension about road noise is that it's about motorized vehicles. In fact, unless the vehicle has a mechanical fault, a large part of the noise comes from the tyre's contact with the road surface.

Hence the use of many more electric vehicles would still give rise to significant road noise.

A briefing from the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology in 2009 noted that[10], while the noise emitted by cars has reduce by eleven decibels since 1970, there has been no associated reduction in the road noise generated. That's because tyre noise is difficult to tackle, and also because traffic volumes have significantly increased, meaning there are more tyres making noise.

Here in Banbury we also have another problem – aircraft.

It's a lot less 'acute' than it was, since the USAF's jet fighters left their local base in 1994. However the trans-Atlantic air corridors for south-east England and middle-Europe cross the skies above North Oxfordshire. At certain times of the day, particularly morning and evening, the 'chronic' level noise from above is almost constant.

The invasive nature of that noise was highlighted in 2010 when the Eyjafjallajökull volcano[11] erupted. I went for a walk and there was something glaringly different about the landscape. Then I realized; no aircraft noise – the result of the flight ban[12].

The effect was stunning, stirring, and unfortunately short-lived.

In 2010 the new coalition government conducted a "bonfire of the Quangos"[13] – closing or merging many of the government's advisory and expert bodies. For me one of the most significant was the abolition of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution[14] (RCEP).

Since 1970, RCEP had produced[15] some of the UK government's best, and most politically embarrassing academic studies on pollution and the environment – from nuclear waste to soil protection.

In 1994, RCEP produced its ground-breaking 18th report on Transport and the Environment[16]. Against the background of the Government's road building programme of that time, the contents were inflammatory – and increased the level of protests against new road construction.

In that report there were two maps which showed the level of 'tranquility' – the area of countryside unaffected by road, aircraft or urban noise – in the south-east of England. One map showed the 'tranquil' area in 1960, the other in 1992. Subtracting one map from the other you realize the level of 'tranquil' countryside which was lost[17] over that thirty-year period.

In their conclusions RCEP stated,

Noise from vehicles and aircraft is a major source of stress and dissatisfaction, notably in towns but now intruding into many formerly tranquil areas. Construction of new roads and airports to accommodate traffic is destroying irreplaceable landscapes and features of our cultural heritage.

It would be easy to reduce this to an issue of car tyres, or the encroachment of urbanization. Instead what environmentalism has to grasp are the clear messages about human well-being which are emerging from ecopsychological research.

Climate change is abstract. Air pollution, except under extreme conditions, is abstract.

Yet studies which examine the fundamental psychological human dependence[18] upon the natural environment can tell us something which, for many, is directly appreciable.

Talking about well-being, or the the stress- and anxiety-reducing qualities of green space, might seem a distraction from the perilous ecological challenges of our time. That is a far too limited perspective:

A few years ago I wrote a briefing on ecopsychology[21] as part of a series[22] on how lightweight camping/backpacking could be a means to address lifestyle sustainability – and allow people to adapt/develop the skills to live lower-impact lifestyles in their own homes as a result.

A focus on ecopsychology as part of local environment campaigns, especially for children[23], could be equally transformative – particularly as current economic and political trends are questioning the value of "big" ecological issues such as climate change.

Small is, after-all, beautiful?

That morning, walking to the top of Banbury's local summit, Crouch Hill, the sun rose through a cloudy horizon. All around the noise level had been growing steadily as the rush hour approached and the roads filled with vehicles.

Moving beyond that requires more than a change of transport policy.

What it requires is a realization that human interaction with nature is an absolute essential for well-being. Far more than just changing your diet or going to the gym, contact with nature is a mechanism[24] to find ourselves as 'whole' people[25]; part of our environment, not shielded or walled away from it. Walking out into a dark morning to sit in a hedge and listen to birds may seem a strange route to health, but the evidence is that it works.


References:

  1. Ramblinactivist 2/17: 'The Ignored Pollutant' – Noise, Health and Ecopsychology, Paul Mobbs, February 2017 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0K2oQWTJco
  2. Streetmap: 'Crouch Hill and Salt Way'http://streetmap.co.uk/map.srf?X=444392&Y=239047&A=Y&Z=115
  3. Buglife: 'Ancient and species-rich hedgerows'https://www.buglife.org.uk/advice-and-publications/advice-on-managing-bap-habitats/ancient-and-species-rich-hedgerows
  4. Doses of Neighborhood Nature: The Benefits for Mental Health of Living with Nature, Cox et al., BioScience, vol.67 no.2 pp.147-155, 13th January 2017 – https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/biosci/biw173
  5. Wikipedia: 'Ecopsychology'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecopsychology
  6. Wikipedia: 'Nuisance in English Law'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuisance_in_English_law
  7. City living and urban upbringing affect neural social stress processing in humans, Lederbogen et al., Nature, vol.474 pp.498-501, 23rd June 2011 – https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andreas_Meyer-Lindenberg/publication/51242929_City_living_and_urban_upbringing_affect_neural_social_stress_processing_in_humans/links/0fcfd50ae0f4d3b8c1000000.pdf
  8. Evaluating the relative influence on population health of domestic gardens and green space along a rural-urban gradient, Dennis and James, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol.157 pp.343-351, January 2017 – http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204616301621
  9. Stress Recovery during Exposure to Nature Sound and Environmental Noise, Alvarsson et al., International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol.7 no.3 pp.1036-1046, 11th March 2010 – http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/7/3/1036/pdf
  10. Post Note 338: 'Environmental Noise', Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, July 2009 – http://www.parliament.uk/documents/post/postpn338.pdf
  11. Wikipedia: '2010 eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_eruptions_of_Eyjafjallaj%C3%B6kull
  12. Guardian On-line: 'UK flights banned as volcanic ash causes disruption across Europe', 15th April 2010 – https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2010/apr/15/iceland-volcano-flights-disruption
  13. Wikipedia: '2010 UK Quango Reforms'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_UK_quango_reforms
  14. Wikipedia: 'Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Commission_on_Environmental_Pollution
  15. List of RCEP's available reportshttp://www.rcep.org.uk/reports/
  16. Transport and the Environment, 18th Report of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, October 1994 – http://www.rcep.org.uk/reports/18-transport/1994-18transport.pdf
  17. Download a composite image showing the 'transquil' area lost fromhttp://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/musings/2017/20170303-tranquil_area_loss-1960_92.jpg
  18. Health Benefits from Nature Experiences Depend on Dose, Shanahan et al., Nature: Scientific Reports, vol.6 no.28551, 3rd June 2016 – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4917833/pdf/srep28551.pdf
  19. Accounting for the Impact of Conservation on Human Well-Being, Milner-Gulland et al., Conservation Biology, vol.28 no.5 pp.1160-1166, March 2014 – http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12277/pdf
  20. Experiencing Connection With Nature: The Matrix of Psychological Well-Being, Mindfulness, and Outdoor Recreation, Wolsko & Lindberg, Ecopsychology, June 2013 – https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christopher_Wolsko/publication/286097989_Experiencing_Connection_With_Nature_The_Matrix_of_Psychological_Well-Being_Mindfulness_and_Outdoor_Recreation/links/569d8c6308aed27a702fd027.pdf
  21. Free Range 'O'-Series Sheet O10: 'The Wilderness Effect – The Psychology of being 'outside'', March 2009 – http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/archive/handouts/o-series/o10/o10-wilderness_effect.pdf
  22. 'The Great Outdoors Project', Free Range 'O'-Series sheets, Paul Mobbs/FreeRange Network, 2008-2010 – http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/archive/handouts_free_range.shtml#handfro01
  23. Natural Childhood Report, Stephen Moss, National Trust, 2012 – https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/documents/read-our-natural-childhood-report.pdf
  24. The great outdoors: how a green exercise environment can benefit all, Gladwell et al., Extreme Physiology & Medicine, vol.2 no.3, January 2013 – https://extremephysiolmed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2046-7648-2-3
  25. Feel better outside, feel better inside: Ecotherapy for mental wellbeing, resilience and recovery, Mind, 2013 – https://www.mind.org.uk/media/336359/Feel-better-outside-feel-better-inside-report.pdf