Free Range Library indexes last updated 15:16, 28/08/2017
This form allows you to search the resource IDs and resource titles of the files in the Free Range Library. If a full match to a key cannot be found, a list of partial matches is returned.
Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.80 pp.119-138, October 2014
Free Range Library News & Events
28/08/17: Library database engine updated (FRAW Library should be listed on searches more easily now).
10/08/17: Further changes to the website architecture completed to allowed continued expansion of the library.
22/12/16: 14 papers have been added to the Extreme Energy, Climate Change and UK Government sections.
22/11/16: 60 papers have been added to the Extreme Energy section.
|Resource title||Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects|
|Author(s)||Edgar Santoyo-Castelazo, Adisa Azapagic|
|Publication/ source||Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.80 pp.119-138|
|Date published||October 2014|
|Summary text/ abstract||Sustainable development of energy systems requires consideration of all three sustainability dimensions: environmental, economic and social. Current work presents a new decision-support framework for facilitating this. Taking a life cycle approach, the framework integrates the three sustainability dimensions to enable assessments at both technology and systems levels. The framework comprises scenario analysis, life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, social sustainability assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis, which are used to assess and identify the most sustainable energy options. The application of the framework is illustrated on the example of future electricity supply in Mexico. Eleven scenarios up to 2050 have been developed considering different technologies, electricity mixes and climate change targets. The results show that, based on the 17 sustainability criteria used in this work, the business-as-usual scenario, mostly based on fossil fuels, is unsustainable regardless of the preferences for different sustainability criteria. This is mainly due to the high costs and environmental impacts associated with fossil fuels. Overall, the most sustainable scenarios are those with higher penetration of renewables (wind, solar, hydro, geothermal and biomass) and nuclear power. These electricity pathways would enable meeting the national greenhouse gas emission targets by 2050 in a more sustainable way than envisaged by the current policy. However, some trade-offs among the sustainability criteria are needed, particularly with respect to the social impacts. These trade-offs can be explored easily within the decision-support framework to reveal how different stakeholder preferences affect the outcomes of sustainability assessment, thus contributing to more informed decision and policy making.|
|Library categories||Climate Change, Economics, Energy, Extr. Energy Economics, 'Limits to Growth'|
|Added to Free Range Library||15/10/2014|