Free Range Library indexes last updated 15:16, 28/08/2017
This form allows you to search the resource IDs and resource titles of the files in the Free Range Library. If a full match to a key cannot be found, a list of partial matches is returned.
Journal of Water, Air and Soil Pollution, vol.225, 18/11/2014
Free Range Library News & Events
28/08/17: Library database engine updated (FRAW Library should be listed on searches more easily now).
10/08/17: Further changes to the website architecture completed to allowed continued expansion of the library.
22/12/16: 14 papers have been added to the Extreme Energy, Climate Change and UK Government sections.
22/11/16: 60 papers have been added to the Extreme Energy section.
|Resource title||Mapping Methane and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations and δ13C Values in the Atmosphere of Two Australian Coal Seam Gas Fields|
|Author(s)||Damien T. Maher, Isaac R. Santos, Douglas R. Tait|
|Publication/ source||Journal of Water, Air and Soil Pollution, vol.225|
|Summary text/ abstract||Fugitive greenhouse gas emissions from unconventional gas extraction processes (e.g. shale gas, tight gas and coal bed methane/coal seam gas) are poorly understood due in part to the extensive area over which these emissions may occur. We apply a rapid qualitative approach for source assessment at the scale of a large gas field. A mobile cavity ring down spectrometer (Picarro G2201-i) was used to provide realtime, high-precision methane and carbon dioxide concentration and carbon isotope ratios (δ13C), allowing for "on the fly" decision making and therefore an efficient and dynamic surveying approach. The system was used to map the atmosphere of a production coal seam gas (CSG) field (Tara region, Australia), an area containing pre-production "exploration" CSG wells (Casino, Australia), and various other potential CO2 and CH4 sources (i.e. wetlands, sewage treatment plants, landfills, urban areas and bushfires). Results showed a widespread enrichment of both CH4 (up to 6.89 ppm) and CO2 (up to 541 ppm) within the production gas field, compared to outside. The CH4 and CO2 δ13C source values showed distinct differences within and outside the production field, indicating a CH4 source within the production field that has a δ13C signature comparable to the regional CSG. While this study demonstrates how the method can be used to qualitatively assess the location and source of emissions, integration with atmospheric models may allow for quantitative assessment of emissions. The distinct patterns observed within the CSG field demonstrates the need to fully quantify the atmospheric flux of natural and anthropogenic, point and diffuse sources of greenhouse gases from individual Australian gas fields before and after production commences.|
|Library categories||Climate Change, Extr. Energy Climate|
|Added to Free Range Library||29/12/2014|
Mapping Methane and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations and δ13C Values in the Atmosphere of Two Australian Coal Seam Gas Fields [3.3 megabytes]
This file is not located within the Free Range Activism Website